Jose Delano vs Murtazali Magomedov
Career Statistics
| Statistic | Jose Delano | Murtazali Magomedov | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Striking | |||
| Sig. Strike Accuracy | 62.2% | 71.4% | ► |
| Sig. Strikes Landed/min | 7.1 | 3.9 | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Absorbed/min | 4.5 | 2.3 | ► |
| Strike Differential | 2.7/min | 1.6/min | ◄ |
| Grappling | |||
| Takedown Accuracy | 0.0% | 50.0% | ► |
| Takedown Defense | — | — | — |
| Takedowns Landed/15min | 0.0 | 11.7 | ► |
| Submission Attempts/15min | 0.0 | 11.7 | ► |
| Control Time/15min | 0:38 | 5:15 | ► |
| Finishing Ability | |||
| KO/TKO % of Wins | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Submission % of Wins | 0.0% | 100.0% | — |
| Decision % of Wins | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Avg Fight Time | 15:00 | 1:17 | — |
| Secondary Stats | |||
| Knockdowns/15min | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Reversals/15min | 0.0 | 0.0 | — |
| Edges | 2 | 6 | 1 even |
Last 5 Fights (Averages)
| Statistic | Jose Delano | Murtazali Magomedov | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sig. Strike Accuracy | 62.2% | 71.4% | ► |
| Sig. Strikes Landed/min | 7.1 | 3.9 | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Absorbed/min | 4.5 | 2.3 | ► |
| Takedown Accuracy | 0.0% | 50.0% | ► |
| Takedown Defense | — | — | — |
| Control Time/Fight | 0:38 | 0:27 | — |
| Edges | 1 | 3 | 2 even |
Last 3 Fights
Jose Delano
Murtazali Magomedov
Common Opponents
No Common Opponents
Analysis Summary
Striking Volume: Jose Delano is the busier striker, landing 7.1 significant strikes per minute vs 3.9. Their opponent absorbs 2.3 strikes per minute on average — Jose Delano's output should find a target.
Striking Accuracy: Murtazali Magomedov connects on 71.4% of significant strikes compared to 62.2%. The 9pp accuracy gap compounds over the rounds.
Grappling: Murtazali Magomedov shoots at 50% accuracy against Jose Delano's 100% defense — Jose Delano should keep it standing.
Finish Threat: Murtazali Magomedov finishes 100% of wins (0% KO/TKO, 100% sub).
Fight Length: Jose Delano's fights average 15:00 vs 1:17 for Murtazali Magomedov. If this reaches the championship rounds, Jose Delano's conditioning history becomes a factor.