Wang Cong vs Natalia Silva
Age
34|29
Height
5'6"|5'4"
Reach
65"|65"
Stance
Southpaw|Southpaw
Career Statistics
| Statistic | Wang Cong | Natalia Silva | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Striking | |||
| Sig. Strike Accuracy | 55.8% | 46.1% | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Landed/min | 6.1 | 4.7 | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Absorbed/min | 3.2 | 2.7 | — |
| Strike Differential | 2.8/min | 2.1/min | — |
| Grappling | |||
| Takedown Accuracy | 66.7% | 40.0% | ◄ |
| Takedown Defense | 78.8% | 90.3% | ► |
| Takedowns Landed/15min | 0.3 | 0.7 | — |
| Submission Attempts/15min | 0.2 | 0.0 | — |
| Control Time/15min | 1:11 | 1:11 | — |
| Finishing Ability | |||
| KO/TKO % of Wins | 20.0% | 22.2% | — |
| Submission % of Wins | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Decision % of Wins | 80.0% | 77.8% | — |
| Avg Fight Time | 13:33 | 14:22 | — |
| Secondary Stats | |||
| Knockdowns/15min | 0.5 | 0.3 | — |
| Reversals/15min | 0.0 | 0.1 | — |
| Edges | 3 | 1 | 5 even |
Fight Dynamics
Career Striking Volume
Wang Cong
Natalia Silva
League median
| Statistic | Wang Cong | Natalia Silva | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fight Shape | |||
| Fight Completion Rate | 82.5% | 89.3% | — |
| Avg Fight Time | 13:33 | 14:22 | — |
| % Fights Inside the Distance | 28.6% | 22.2% | — |
| Strength of UFC Schedule | |||
| Opponent UFC Win % (all) | 61.4% | 63.2% | — |
| Opponent UFC Record (all) | 27-17 (61.4%) | 55-32 (63.2%) | — |
| Opponent Record (among wins) | 18-15 (54.5%) | 55-32 (63.2%) | — |
| Positional Profile | |||
| % Time at Distance (approx.) | 78.0% | 74.9% | — |
| % Time in Control | 8.0% | 7.9% | — |
| % Time Controlled | 14.1% | 17.2% | — |
| Control Rate of Clinch/Ground Time | 36.2% | 31.6% | — |
| Distance Striking | |||
| Distance Sig. Landed / Min | 7.04 | 5.85 | ◀ |
| Distance Sig. Absorbed / Min | 3.70 | 3.29 | — |
| Distance Striking Differential / Min | +3.34 | +2.56 | — |
| Distance Strike Accuracy | 54.1% | 44.8% | ◀ |
| Distance Strike Defense | 58.9% | 64.7% | ▶ |
| Power & Pressure | |||
| KDs per 100 Power Strikes | 0.78 | 0.64 | — |
| Knocked Down per 100 Absorbed | 0.80 | 0.00 | ▶ |
| TD Attempts per 5 Distance Min | 0.20 | 0.77 | — |
| TDs Faced per 5 Distance Min | 2.23 | 1.60 | — |
| Fade Index (R3 / R1 pace) | 1.11 | 1.48 | — |
UFC fights only. Metrics with insufficient data show "—" and award no edge.
Methodology →
Last 5 Fights (Averages)
| Statistic | Wang Cong | Natalia Silva | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sig. Strike Accuracy | 58.1% | 44.8% | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Landed/min | 6.1 | 4.5 | ◄ |
| Sig. Strikes Absorbed/min | 3.4 | 2.9 | — |
| Takedown Accuracy | 100.0% | 44.4% | ◄ |
| Takedown Defense | 77.4% | 88.2% | ► |
| Control Time/Fight | 1:30 | 1:20 | — |
| Edges | 3 | 1 | 2 even |
Last 3 Fights
Wang Cong
LOSS
vs. Natalia Silva
UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang • Oct 2026Women's FlyweightTITLE
Wang Cong98/20648%TD 0/0Ctrl 2:39
Natalia Silva109/21650%TD 3/5Ctrl 4:12KD 1
WIN
vs. Tracy Cortez
UFC 329: McGregor vs. Holloway 2 • Jul 2026Women's Flyweight
Wang Cong137/21564%TD 0/0Ctrl 1:22
Tracy Cortez72/15646%TD 1/9Ctrl 0:31
WIN
vs. Eduarda Moura
UFC Fight Night: Bautista vs. Oliveira • Feb 2026Women's Flyweight
Wang Cong39/7155%TD 0/0Ctrl 3:11KD 1
Eduarda Moura12/3435%TD 3/12Ctrl 8:06
Natalia Silva
WIN
vs. Wang Cong
UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang • Oct 2026Women's FlyweightTITLE
Natalia Silva109/21650%TD 3/5Ctrl 4:12KD 1
Wang Cong98/20648%TD 0/0Ctrl 2:39
WIN
vs. Rose Namajunas
UFC 324: Gaethje vs. Pimblett • Jan 2026Women's Flyweight
Natalia Silva51/13338%TD 1/2Ctrl 1:24
Rose Namajunas26/9428%TD 1/5Ctrl 2:09
WIN
vs. Alexa Grasso
UFC 315: Muhammad vs. Della Maddalena • May 2025Women's Flyweight
Natalia Silva65/16440%TD 0/0Ctrl 0:15
Alexa Grasso45/13932%TD 0/2Ctrl 0:40
Common Opponents
vs. Victoria Leonardo
Wang Cong
WIN
UFC Fight Night: Cannonier vs. Borralho • Aug 2024Women's Flyweight
Wang Cong10/2638%TD 0/0Ctrl 0:02KD 1
Victoria Leonardo1/911%TD 0/0Ctrl 0:00
Natalia Silva
WIN
UFC Fight Night: Dern vs. Hill • May 2023Women's Flyweight
Natalia Silva20/4544%TD 0/0Ctrl 0:16KD 1
Victoria Leonardo7/1839%TD 0/1Ctrl 0:00
Analysis Summary
Striking Volume: Wang Cong is the busier striker, landing 6.1 significant strikes per minute vs 4.7. Their opponent absorbs 2.7 strikes per minute on average — Wang Cong's output should find a target.
Striking Accuracy: Wang Cong connects on 55.8% of significant strikes compared to 46.1%. The 10pp accuracy gap compounds over the rounds.
Grappling: Natalia Silva shoots at 40% accuracy against Wang Cong's 79% defense — Wang Cong should keep it standing.
Finish Threat: Both fighters trend toward decisions — Wang Cong (80% of wins) and Natalia Silva (78%).